The main Recording Industry Association of America web site www.riaa.com has experienced intermittent outages since the spread of the MyDoom.F virus, which programs computers to launch a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack on the site.

RIAA web site availability

The RIAA site has a history of outages related to DDoS attacks (including extended downtime inJuly 2002 and January 2003) and has frequently been defaced.

Antivirus vendor Trend Micro says it has detected more than 23,000 machines infected with MyDoom.F, a sizeable number but far less than its predecessor, MyDoom.A, which launched a DDoS that kept www.sco.com site offline for the first half of February.

Speaking of which, SCO's new url, was offline for several hours last night after several weeks of uneventful uptime. A dynamically updating chart of www.thescogroup.com can be found here.

Posted by Rich Miller at 28 February 2004 in Performance | Print this Page
There were 176 unique phishing attacks in January, a 52 percent increase from December, according to data from the Anti Phishing Working Group, an industry association tracking phishing and e-mail spoofing. The number of scams continued to increase throughout the month, averaging more than seven separate scams per day by the third week in January.

Nearly a third of the attacks in January used the "@" user authentication syntax to construct disguised URLs in links. A Microsoft security patch released Feb. 2 disabled that capability in the Internet Explorer browser. A smaller number - seven percent of January attacks - exploited an IE flaw that causes the browser to display an incorrect URL in its address and status bars.

Posted by Rich Miller at 25 February 2004 in Security | Print this Page
Affinity Internet is the world's 10th-largest host, based on its 216K active sites. Based in Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., Affinity is best recognized for ValueWeb, the largest of its six hosting brands. Affinity CEO Peter Chambers guides the company's strategic direction and day-to-day operations. In our interview, Chambers discussed Affinity's approach to customizing its brands to target segments of the hosting market.

Q. You've structured your offerings as multiple hosting brands, with separate identities for ValueWeb, SkyNetWeb, Bigstep, HostSave and WinSave. What have been the benefits and challenges of this approach, as opposed to a unified brand?

A. Quite simply, we have different brands because they target different audiences. Offering multiple brands enables us to speak directly to that audience. What a tech-savvy customer needs from a hosting company is different from what a small business owner with zero technology background may need. Multiple brands allow us to communicate to that audience in a vernacular they understand. Providing the six elements of our value proposition means different things to different kinds of customers - having multiple brands helps us achieve this.

Posted by Rich Miller at 25 February 2004 in Hosting, Interviews | Print this Page
The newest version of MyDoom deletes Microsoft Word and Excel documents from a victim's hard drive, along with images and videos. MyDoom.F was discovered Feb. 20 and spread slowly at first, but is prompting increased warnings from security vendors as it begins to spread more widely.

Like its predecessors, MyDoom.F has its own SMTP engine and spreads through e-mail attachments, and is programmed to launch denial of service attacks on web sites. The DDoS component of MyDoom.F targets www.microsoft.com and www.riaa.com (the Recording Industry Association of America)

MyDoom.F also opens a backdoor on the victim's computer, using port 1080. Some analyses suggest that it also opens a backdoor on multiple ports between 3000 and 5000 and disables antivirus software.

Widespread awareness of MyDoom-related threats has focused fresh attention on the basics of e-mail security, particularly regarding the opening of attachments. That should work to check the spread of MyDoom.F, as will its more destructive payload, which makes it harder for the malware's activity to go unnoticed for very long on compromised machines.

Posted by Rich Miller at 24 February 2004 in Security | Print this Page

Changes in domain pricing amongst the largest providers over the past month have been fairly minor. 1&1 Internet now charges $5.88 a year for a .com domain, down from $5.99 as it adjusted to fit its "49 cents a month" web site marketing. Go Daddy returned to $7.95 annually for .com names after a brief hike to $8.95 last month. Go Daddy's most aggressive discounting is for .us and .biz domains, which are currently priced at $4.95 a year.

Retail Domain Name Prices, Jan. 2004
Company One-year
.com price
 Primary Business  Primary Region
1&1 Internet AG $5.88 Mixed Hosting Europe
EV1Servers $6.49 Dedicated Hosting America
Hostway $6.95 Shared Hosting America
Web.com $6.95 Mixed Hosting America
GoDaddy Inc $7.95 Domain Registrar America
RegisterFly $9.99 Domain Registrar America
Host Europe $13.29 Mixed Hosting Europe
Dotster $14.95 Domain Registrar America
FastHosts $17.12 Mixed Hosting Europe
Verio $19.00 Mixed Hosting America
eNom $29.95 Domain Registrar America
The Planet $30.00 Mixed Hosting America
Network Solutions $34.99 Domain Registrar America
Register.com $35.00 Domain Registrar America
Melbourne IT $35.00 Domain Registrar America

Hostway has acquired RegistryPro from Register.com, and will be the registrar of .pro domain names when they launch in the second quarter. The deal is subject to approval by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). The financial terms of the acquisition were undisclosed. "We believe lawyers, accountants, doctors and service professionals will be eager to use the .pro domain as a way of identifying and differentiating their professional status," said Lucas Roh, President and CEO of Hostway, which will honor all existing .pro sunrise registrations. The .pro extension is available exclusively for lawyers, accountants and doctors, and bundles a domain name and digital certificate.

Posted by mhp at 19 February 2004 in Hosting | Print this Page
Internet titans Strato and Network Solutions are battling over the fate of more than 200,000 .com, .net and .org domains registered by Strato through a reseller agreement with Network Solutions, which manages those top-level domains. Strato, one of the largest hosting companies with more than 1.9 million hostnames, wants to relocate the domains to its own subsidiary at a reduced rate. Network Solutions responded with e-mails to the domain owners - who registered their domains through Strato - asserting they needed to deal directly with Network Solutions.

A German court intervened, ordering NSI to stop soliciting Strato's domain clients. Strato said it would pursue legal action in the US as well, and alleged that Network Solutions "has begun manipulating data to the disadvantage of STRATO clients. NSI is trying to prevent the legitimate relocation of the domains with newer and ever-changing technical hurdles," Strato said in a press statement.

Posted by Rich Miller at 18 February 2004 in Hosting | Print this Page
In a sign of the growing diversity of phishing scams, a new e-mail combines social engineering tricks and HTML coding to defraud victims using a keylogging program that attempts to capture banking usernames and passwords.

The latest scam, documented at Codefish Spamwatch, operates via an email with the subject "Police investigation."

Posted by Rich Miller at 16 February 2004 in Security | Print this Page

The number of hostnames found by the Web Server Survey running Windows Server 2003 overtook NT4 this month. We now find over 1.25M hostnames running on Windows 2003, a 283% increase since August.

win2003_0204.PNG

Comparing the operating systems with those of September 03 shows the majority of the sites to have migrated from Windows 2000 (534K), but also 55K of the sites to have migrated from Linux, 56K from FreeBSD and 8K from Solaris, with 272K of the hostnames running Win2003 new sites not previously running a different operating system.

Posted by mandy at 16 February 2004 in Around the Net | Print this Page
A new technique called "visual spoofing" provides a way for Internet phishing scams to convincingly mimick the web sites of banks and credit card companies. The technique alters the user interface of the web browser, substituting images for parts of the browser interface that would normally help users detect the fraud.

Visual spoofing, as outlined by Don Park, uses javascript links to launch a new browser window without scrollbars, menubars, toolbars and the status bar. This coding trick is commonly used to launch pop-up ads. In visual spoofing, these GUI elements are replaced by images, allowing the site creator to substitute a fake status bar containing the URL for a legitimate site, along with an image of a "lock" indicating a secure SSL site. Park has posted a demo of the technique, which works in multiple browsers. End users have the ability to configure their browser to prevent this behavior.

Phishing attacks seek to trick account holders into divulging sensitive account information through the use of e-mails which appear to come from trusted financial institutions and retailers. Such scams have multiplied in recent months, with many taking advantage of a bug in Internet Explorer that made it easier for fraudsters to simulate the URLs of target financial institution.

Microsoft issued a patch to repair that problem on Feb. 2. Visual spoofing does not rely on the URL spoofing, relying instead on the fake images to accomplish the deceipt.

Posted by Rich Miller at 15 February 2004 in Security | Print this Page
The www.sco.com hostname remains out of the DNS, three days after the denial of service attack connected to the MyDoom virus was scheduled to finish. Computers infected by MyDoom, which at one point estimated to be more than 400,000, were programmed to launch a DDoS on SCO's main web site Feb. 1 and end the attack Feb. 12, this past Thursday.

However, SCO have not yet put ww.sco.com back into the DNS, perhaps indicating that varients of the virus may be continuing the attack, or perhaps simply that they perceive that the cost/benefit of the site has become unfavourable.

% host www.sco.com
Host www.sco.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)

SCO took www.sco.com out of the DNS shortly after the attack began Feb. 1, and began using www.thescogroup.com as an alternate site. That URL has also experienced performance problems at first, but has been available in recent days.

A dynamically updating table of the sites affected by the MyDoom DDoS is available here.

Posted by Rich Miller at 15 February 2004 in Performance | Print this Page
Security experts say this week's leak of partial source code for Windows 2000 and Windows NT probably won't mean a huge change in the security of Windows machines. The leaked code - about 15 million lines of the Win2K operating system's 35 million lines of code - isn't substantial enough for pirates to create wholesale copies, but may provide additional ammunition for hackers and virus writers.

"The leak will do some damage to the security of Windows machines, but it's not clear how much," said Ed Felten of Princeton University, a security researcher who has reviewed Windows source code and was an expert witness in the antitrust case against Microsoft. "There's a longstanding debate about the security implications of open source development. Source code access makes it easier to find security bugs. With open source, you make it easier for honest outsiders to find bugs, which is good, but you also make it easier for malicious outsiders to find bugs, which is bad.

"This kind of leak give us the worst of both worlds: honest outsiders will avoid looking at the stolen code, while malicious outsiders use the code; so you get the security drawbacks of open source without the security benefits," Felten added. "This will only matter, though, if the bad guys would otherwise have trouble finding bugs, which may not be the case."

Posted by Rich Miller at 15 February 2004 in Security | Print this Page
eEye Digital Security has savaged Microsoft for taking more than six months to patch a critical security vulnerability in Windows' implementation of ASN.1, which says it identified in July 2003. Marc Maiffret branded the response "ridiculous" and has produced a web page detailing three additional high impact security vulnerabilities that the firm reported to Microsoft more than three months ago.

According to eEye, the vulnerabilities include a remote exploit that could allow attackers to gain system privileges, and a denial of service strategy that could "total system failure." Both vulnerabilities were reported Sept. 10, and affect default installations of Windows in use on more than 300 million computers, including Windows NT, Windows 2000, Windows XP and Windows Server 2003. eEye reported an additional high-risk remote exploit on Oct. 8.

Posted by Rich Miller at 12 February 2004 in Security | Print this Page
A new version of the DoomJuice worm seeks to launch a more effective denial of service attack on Microsoft's web site tomorrow, according to F-Secure.

The new worm, DoomJuice.B, sets random HTTP headers to make it more difficult to filter the attack traffic, seeking to work around a defensive measure used by Microsoft earlier this week, when www.microsoft.com dropped requests without User-Agent headers to differentiate between Web browsers and the DDoS attack agents. The DoomJuice.B DDoS also initiates twice as many requests as its predecessor, launching 32-192 parallel threads instead of the 16-96 of DoomJuice.A.

Posted by Rich Miller at 11 February 2004 in Performance, Security | Print this Page
Microsoft's main web site at www.microsoft.com experienced performance problems this morning, probably due to a DDoS attack launched by a new version of the MyDoom virus.

Microsoft web site performance

A dynamically updating graph is available here, with performance data for all the sites involved in the MyDoom DDoS located here.

This morning at around 9am GMT response times to www.microsoft.com surged, and for a time the site failed to respond. Subsequently, the www.microsoft.com began dropping requests without User-Agent headers, apparently to differentiate between traffic from Web browsers and the DDoS attack agents. Our monitoring requests, which do not normally set a User-Agent, were also dropped. These were changed to supply a user-agent header on requests to www.microsoft.com around 2pm GMT and have since seen mixed results, with relatively normal results from London, but some extended and erratic response times from Atlanta, New York and Texas.

General internet connectivity has not been noticeably impaired with 41 of 52 leading hosting company sites experiencing no failed requests in the last 24 hours.

Posted by Rich Miller at 9 February 2004 in Performance | Print this Page

Ranking by Failed Requests and Connection time,
January 1st - 31st 2004

hosting_prov_jan2004.png

During January both the INetU and Secure Dog sites were faultless with no failed requests at all from any of our five measurement points.

This is the second month running that INetU's site has had no failed requests at all, and it has now been in the top three for the last four months. As neither INetU or Secure Dog had any failed requests, INetU is ranked above Secure Dog because the average connection time from our performance measurment points to the INetU site was faster.

Third was www.pair.com, a consistently reliable site which was placed fourth for H2 2003. All of the top three sites run on BSD operating systems.

Two European hosting company sites made it in to the top 10. Cable & Wireless and Energis, respectively the second and third largest telcos' in the UK were fifth and tenth. Energis is Netcraft's own connectivity provider, but has no special advantage as none of the measurement points are on the Energis network.

Posted by mhp at 4 February 2004 in Hosting, Performance | Print this Page
Strong growth was seen at many of the top hosters this month. Leading the pack was 1&1 Internet, which gained 173K hostnames, with particularly strong growth in Europe.

1&1's new American unit added a further 19K hostnames in the run-up to the company's Jan. 22 launch of paid services in the U.S. 1&1 says it signed up more than 200K of the free "test drive" accounts, with about 24K active sites visible thus far.

Go Daddy also had strong growth as its shared hosting business gained traction, while EV1Servers returned to form after two consecutive flat months.

Top Hosting Providers By Growth, Dec 03 to Jan 04
Hosting Company Dec 03 Jan 04 Growth %
Growth
Primary
Region
1&1 Internet AG 3,505,881 3,679,246 173,365 4.9% Europe
GoDaddy Inc 1,635,680 1,801,177 165,497 10.1% America
EV1Servers 597,630 682,197 84,567 14.2% America
Global Media 85,719 146,791 61,072 71.2% Asia
Strato AG 1,918,889 1,974,102 55,213 2.9% Europe
FASTNET Corp. 20,442 69,560 49,118 240.3% America
eNom 565,083 594,290 29,207 5.2% America
The Planet 124,493 152,369 27,876 22.4% America
Host Europe 547,618 571,607 23,989 4.4% Europe
Aruba 170,088 190,859 20,771 12.2% Europe

Posted by Rich Miller at 4 February 2004 in Hosting | Print this Page
As the CEO and "HeadSurfer" of EV1Servers, Robert Marsh has directed the Houston-based dedicated server company through spectacular growth. In our interview, Marsh shares his thoughts on EV1's success, the high cost of domains and SSL certificates, and the difference between "affordable" and "bargain basement."

Q. Last year was a huge one for EV1Servers, as your company had a big influx of new customers, rebranded itself, and wrestled with growing pains that tested your infrastructure. What was 2003 like for you?

A. 2003 was the best - and at the same time most difficult - year of my life. Our team made a long list of accomplishments: we began offering first cPanel, then Windows hosting, then domain registration and SSL certificates. We also overcame a lot of challenges. I'm particularly proud that not one customer suffered a single second of outage when a transformer explosion in June cut off our utility power for six days. Most importantly, 2003 made us a better company. We ended the year with a more secure network, a stronger and more experienced team, and a new data center whose first phase will see us through our next 12,000 servers. I think this puts us in a great position to make even more progress in 2004.

Posted by Rich Miller at 3 February 2004 in Hosting, Interviews | Print this Page
Microsoft has made an alternative web site available at https://information.microsoft.com. in case people experience difficulty accessing www.microsoft.com.

Although our measurement points have seen some requests to www.microsoft.com fail today - to put this in context, www.inetu.net, the top ranked hosting company site hasn't had a request fail in over two months - it's been pretty much business as usual for the web site to date, with most response times little different from any other day.

Windows computers infected with MyDoom.B are programmed to begin attacking www.microsoft.com today at 13:09:18 (UTC) and continue through March 1st.

Performance data for the sites involved in the MyDoom DDoS is available here.

Posted by Rich Miller at 3 February 2004 in Performance | Print this Page
Overnight, response times on www.thescogroup.com have become erratic, and the site has suffered over an hour of outages. Performance data for the sites involved in the MyDoom DDos is available here.

Additionally, www2.sco.com has been taken out of the DNS.

% host www2.sco.com
Host www2.sco.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Posted by mhp at 3 February 2004 in Performance | Print this Page
Microsoft has issued a promised patch for Internet Explorer that addresses a URL spoofing flaw, as well as a critical security hole that could allow crackers to gain control of Internet-connected computers through Javascript links in web pages.

The latest IE update disallows the use of the "@" character in URLs, addressing a snafu which has helped phishing scammers to disguise the Internet address of a fake Web site. Once the update is installed, including the @ symbol in urls will return an "invalid syntax error" message. Internet scammers have been using @ signs in urls to trick bank customers into revealing their account details.

The latest patch also fixes a cross-domain scripting vulnerability in Internet Explorer, through which a remote attacker could bypass security measures that limit the commands that Web-based code can execute on a user machine. The flaw enables a link containing Javascript code to run commands in the Local Machine Zone with user privileges.

Netcraft has developed a service to help banks and other financial organizations identify sites which may be trying to construct frauds, identity theft and phishing attacks by pretending to be the bank, or are implying that the site has a relationship with the bank when in fact there is none.

Posted by Rich Miller at 3 February 2004 in Security | Print this Page
In anticipation of the MyDoom.B payload striking www.microsoft.com tomorrow, Microsoft have shortened the TTL [time to live] on the www.microsoft.com DNS entry to five minutes. Yesterday the TTL was set to just under an hour.

Essentially, Microsoft is accepting the significantly higher load on its name servers [outsourced to Akamai] as the premium of an insurance policy in the event that it wants to move www.microsoft.com very quickly.

In this regard Microsoft is being very circumspect towards the potential payload of MyDoom B virus, which anti-virus companies have tended to belittle. Of course, this may simply reflect the fact that Microsoft is directly at risk from the payload, while the anti-virus companies are merely informed bystanders, rather than Microsoft's view of the likely traffic levels being significantly different to the anti-virus companies' expectations.

Our expectation is that Microsoft will defend the payload from its own network, at least initially. If Microsoft does decide to deploy Akamai's http caching, this should not necessarily be read as an admission that its in-house infrastructure could not cope; it is more likely to be motivated by a public spirited desire to keep the traffic off the Internet's main arteries by absorbing the payload as close to the sources of the attacks as possible.

Posted by mhp at 2 February 2004 in Performance | Print this Page
The SCO Group, Inc. will use www.thescogroup.com as an alternate web site while www.sco.com remains under a denial of service attack from machines infected with the My Doom worm, the company said this morning. The URL is expected to serve as an interm site for SCO through Feb. 12, when the DDoS is expected to conclude. "SCO has developed layers of contingency plans to communicate with our valued customers, resellers, developers, partners and shareholders," asid Jeff Carlon, the company's director of worldwide IT infrastructure, who called the new domain "the first step" in its planning.

sco.com actually resolves to the same ip address as www.thescogroup.com.

% host sco.com
sco.com has address 216.250.128.21
% host www.thescogroup.com
www.thescogroup.com has address 216.250.128.21
%

Performance data on www.thescogroup.com is available now.

Posted by Rich Miller at 2 February 2004 in Performance | Print this Page
Further corroboration of the generally good connectivity across the Internet can be seen by viewing www2.sco.com. which is on the same Class C that www.sco.com occupied until earlier this evening. http://www2.sco.com/ loads very quickly to the eye, and the traceroute seems very good considering the circumstances.

A graph of performance of www2.sco.com has just started appearing. while a comparative table of performance of some of the sites connected with the MyDoom virus is also available. Each is updated every fifteen minutes.

Note that sco.com and caldera.com, which both shared the same ip address as www.sco.com are still down, possibly because of stale DNS caching, or perhaps simply because the machine that ran those sites has been shut down.

% host sco.com
sco.com has address 216.250.128.12
%host www.caldera.com
www.caldera.com has address 216.250.128.12

The most recent Web Server Survey found some 58 hostnames running web sites that resolved to this ip address, and one would presume that SCO is unconcerned about their availability, since it would have been possible to give www.sco.com its own ip address in the prelude to the DDoS.

Posted by mhp at 1 February 2004 in Performance | Print this Page
SCO have done the public spirited thing and taken www.sco.com out of the DNS. This means that there will be no more http traffic travelling across the internet from the infected machines to www.sco.com.

Plausibly, the hostmaster's plan was set the TTL to 60 seconds to give himself the flexibility of having changes propogate promptly, and then see what the http traffic was like before making a decision to remove the site from the DNS. He has now decided that he has seen enough. SCO may also have been the subject of pressure from ISPs to put a stop to the http traffic.

%host www.sco.com
Host www.sco.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
% dig www.sco.com
www.sco.com.                   IN      A
% date
Sun Feb  1 19:29:50 GMT 2004

Generally, conditions on the Internet seem very acceptable at the moment, with few hosting company sites experiencing failed requests . This contrasts markedly with forecasts from Anti-virus companies and this morning's press release from SCO which reported the Internet as being overwhelmed.

Posted by mhp at 1 February 2004 in Performance | Print this Page
We had expected that SCO might take www.sco.com out of the DNS in the run up to the MyDoom DDoS payload in order to keep the denial of service http traffic off the Internet. So far, though, www.sco.com still resolves and receives http requests, though closing the connection without sending a response.

That said, the sco.com hostmaster is reserving his options, with the TTL set to just 60 seconds at time of writing.

% host www.sco.com
www.sco.com has address 216.250.128.12
% dig www.sco.com
www.sco.com.            60      IN      A       216.250.128.12
% telnet www.sco.com http
Trying 216.250.128.12...
Connected to www.sco.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
Connection closed by foreign host.

Contrastingly, www.microsoft.com's performance is as normal. Microsoft has chosen to leave the hostname still resolving to a set of 8 ip addresses in Redmond, rather than point it at Akamai's content distribution network, with their TTL set to just under an hour.

www.microsoft.com.      7       IN      CNAME   www.microsoft.akadns.net.
www.microsoft.akadns.net. 7     IN      CNAME   www2.microsoft.akadns.net.
www2.microsoft.akadns.net. 8    IN      A       207.46.156.252
www2.microsoft.akadns.net. 8    IN      A       207.46.245.92
www2.microsoft.akadns.net. 8    IN      A       207.46.245.156
www2.microsoft.akadns.net. 8    IN      A       207.46.249.252
www2.microsoft.akadns.net. 8    IN      A       207.46.250.222
www2.microsoft.akadns.net. 8    IN      A       207.46.250.252
www2.microsoft.akadns.net. 8    IN      A       207.46.134.221
www2.microsoft.akadns.net. 8    IN      A       207.46.144.188

A graph of the www.sco.com response times, is available while people may also subscribe to receive outage alerts on the sites.

Elsewhere, the Internet looks quite benign with presently just 10 of the fifty hosting company sites monitored by Netcraft showing failed requests during the last 24 hours, and none showing outages.

Posted by mhp at 1 February 2004 in Performance | Print this Page

In the February 2004 survey we received responses from 47,173,415 sites.

The number of responding sites is up by over one million from January; however the percentage share between the different web servers is little changed, with Microsoft's half a percent drop in active sites being the most salient point of interest.

Graph of market share for top servers across all domains, August 1995 - February 2004

Top Developers
Developer January 2004Percent February 2004Percent Change
Apache3104092267.383170388467.21-0.17
Microsoft967597921.00984997120.88-0.12
SunONE15038553.2616572953.510.25
Zeus7520531.637552271.60-0.03
Posted by wss at 1 February 2004 in Web Server Survey | Print this Page