1. Most Reliable Hosting Company Sites in May 2010

    Rank Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total
    1 New York Internet FreeBSD 0:00:00 0.011 0.155 0.085 0.182 0.441
    2 INetU unknown 0:00:00 0.015 0.080 0.060 0.133 0.335
    3 DataPipe FreeBSD 0:00:00 0.022 0.059 0.011 0.023 0.033
    4 Multacom FreeBSD 0:00:00 0.022 0.219 0.082 0.164 0.396
    5 Rackspace Linux 0:00:00 0.022 0.106 0.088 0.175 0.175
    6 One.com Linux 0:00:00 0.026 0.369 0.083 0.166 0.166
    7 www.navisite.com Linux 0:00:00 0.026 0.244 0.092 0.185 0.378
    8 iWeb Technologies Linux 0:00:00 0.030 0.096 0.064 0.128 0.128
    9 www.acens.com Linux 0:00:00 0.030 0.221 0.097 0.423 0.735
    10 www.aruba.it Windows Server 2003 0:00:00 0.034 0.858 0.089 0.180 0.180
    See full table

    The most reliable hosting company site in May was New York Internet, responding to all but three of Netcraft's requests. It was served by Apache running on FreeBSD.

    Established in 1996, New York Internet is located near Wall Street and maintains its own data centers. The company's core services include dedicated servers, colocation and virtual web hosting.

    INetU came a close second with just four failed requests.

    INetU is an enterprise managed hosting company located in Allentown, PA. They have been in business since 1996 and notably offer a 100% uptime service level guarantee. Managed services provided by INetU include MySQL and MS SQL database clusters, Exchange servers, virtualization and firewalls. Their clients include Fortune 500 companies such as Microsoft, Intel, Northrop Grumman and Canon.

    Five of May's top ten most reliable sites used Linux, while three ran on FreeBSD and one on Windows Server 2003.

    Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of around forty leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

    From a customer's point of view, the percentage of failed requests is more pertinent than outages on hosting companies' own sites, as this gives a pointer to reliability of routing, and this is why we choose to rank our table by fewest failed requests, rather than shortest periods of outage.

    Information on the measurement process and current measurements is available.

    Posted by Tom Robertshaw on 8th June, 2010 in Hosting, Performance

  2. The Pirate Bay returns to the internet

    Popular BitTorrent search engine The Pirate Bay has just come back online, around a day after it was apparently forced offline by a German court injunction filed a week ago.

    The Motion Picture Association subsequently made a press release [pdf] about the injunction against CB3Rob Ltd & Co KG (Cyberbunker) and its operator, Mr. Sven Olaf Kamphuis, "restraining them from connecting The Pirate Bay site to the Internet".

    However, the site is already back online — hosted at the same place as before — and now presents a defiant 'lolcat' message, presumably aimed at those who are trying to get the site shut down:

    piratebayisback.jpg

    The Pirate Bay publishes many of the legal threats it receives, but proudly boasts that no torrents have ever been removed from the site.

    piratebayuptime.png

    The Pirate Bay website runs Linux and uses the lighttpd webserver.

    Posted by Paul Mutton on 18th May, 2010 in Performance

  3. Most Reliable Hosting Company Sites in April 2010

    Rank Company site OS Outage
    hh:mm:ss
    Failed
    Req%
    DNS Connect First
    byte
    Total
    1 DataPipe FreeBSD 0:00:00 0.015 0.031 0.027 0.057 0.083
    2 GoDaddy.com Inc Windows Server 2003 0:00:00 0.023 0.161 0.092 0.196 0.781
    3 New York Internet FreeBSD 0:00:00 0.027 0.106 0.051 0.113 0.312
    4 iWeb Technologies Linux 0:00:00 0.031 1.187 0.063 0.127 0.127
    5 www.dinahosting.com Linux 0:00:00 0.031 0.178 0.128 0.256 0.256
    6 www.navisite.com Linux 0:00:00 0.035 0.353 0.102 0.683 0.896
    7 www.netcetera.co.uk Windows Server 2003 0:00:00 0.039 0.084 0.050 0.107 0.212
    8 Virtual Internet Linux 0:00:00 0.039 0.173 0.054 0.162 0.329
    9 ServInt Linux 0:00:00 0.039 0.162 0.063 0.146 0.331
    10 www.acens.com Linux 0:00:00 0.046 0.298 0.129 0.440 0.845

    See full table

    The most reliable hosting company site in April was DataPipe, once again responding to all but four of Netcraft's requests.

    DataPipe provides custom managed hosting solutions for businesses with complex Internet facing infrastructures with over 1,000 customers in seven data centres across the United States, Europe and China.

    The second most reliable hosting company site in April was GoDaddy, responding to all but six of Netcraft's requests.

    GoDaddy is the world's largest domain name registrar, managing more than 40 million domains.

    Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of around forty leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

    From a customer's point of view, the percentage of failed requests is more pertinent than outages on hosting companies' own sites, as this gives a pointer to reliability of routing, and this is why we choose to rank our table by fewest failed requests, rather than shortest periods of outage.

    Further information on the measurement process and current measurements are available.

    Posted by bjb on 13th May, 2010 in Hosting, Performance

  4. Most Reliable Hosting Company Sites in March 2010

    Rank Company site OS Outage
    hh:mm:ss
    Failed
    Req%
    DNS Connect First
    byte
    Total
    1 www.memset.com Linux 0:00:00 0.012 0.586 0.129 0.260 0.260
    2 DataPipe FreeBSD 0:00:00 0.016 0.065 0.027 0.056 0.083
    3 iWeb Technologies Linux 0:00:00 0.016 0.134 0.083 0.165 0.165
    4 ReliableServers.com FreeBSD 0:00:00 0.016 0.250 0.083 0.197 0.337
    5 INetU unknown 0:00:00 0.021 0.702 0.073 0.158 0.301
    6 Swishmail FreeBSD 0:00:00 0.021 0.159 0.086 0.173 0.438
    7 www.singlehop.com Linux 0:00:00 0.021 0.258 0.104 0.429 0.962
    8 Hosting 4 Less Linux 0:00:00 0.025 0.116 0.091 0.186 0.474
    9 Kattare Internet Services Linux 0:00:00 0.029 0.153 0.093 0.187 0.443
    10 www.dinahosting.com Linux 0:00:00 0.029 0.121 0.130 0.258 0.258

    See full table

    Memset had the most reliable hosting company site in March, responding to all but three of Netcraft's requests.

    Memset provides dedicated physical and virtual servers, all-inclusive managed hosting and cloud-computing services from their two data centres near Reading, UK. Memset uses Apache on Linux to run their own website.

    The second most reliable hosting company site in March was DataPipe, responding to all but four of Netcraft's requests.

    DataPipe provides custom managed hosting solutions for businesses with complex Internet facing infrastructures with over 1,000 customers in seven data centres across the United States, Europe and China. DataPipe use Apache on FreeBSD to run their own website.

    Six of the top ten in March were identified as running Linux and three as running FreeBSD. The operating system used by one of the top ten could not be identified.

    Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of around forty leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

    From a customer's point of view, the percentage of failed requests is more pertinent than outages on hosting companies' own sites, as this gives a pointer to reliability of routing, and this is why we choose to rank our table by fewest failed requests, rather than shortest periods of outage.

    Further information on the measurement process and current measurements are available.

    Posted by Jennifer Cownie on 1st April, 2010 in Hosting, Performance

  5. Most Reliable Hosting Company Sites in February 2010

    Rank Company site OS Outage
    hh:mm:ss
    Failed
    Req%
    DNS Connect First
    byte
    Total
    1 www.navisite.com Linux 0.000 0.779 0.033 0.552 0.656
    2 DataPipe FreeBSD 0:00:00 0.005 0.397 0.035 0.061 0.091
    3 INetU unknown 0:00:00 0.005 0.524 0.050 0.106 0.186
    4 Hosting 4 Less Linux 0:00:00 0.011 0.428 0.105 0.220 0.560
    5 www.singlehop.com Linux 0:00:00 0.016 0.205 0.052 0.342 0.570
    6 www.dinahosting.com Linux 0:00:00 0.016 0.115 0.089 0.182 0.182
    7 New York Internet FreeBSD 0:00:00 0.021 0.054 0.031 0.070 0.195
    8 Virtual Internet Linux 0:00:00 0.021 0.617 0.078 0.210 0.443
    9 www.memset.com Linux 0:00:00 0.021 0.616 0.080 0.160 0.160
    10 Hostbasket Windows Server 2008 0:00:00 0.021 0.377 0.083 0.177 0.177

    See full table

    NaviSite had the most reliable hosting company site in February, responding to all of Netcraft's requests.

    NaviSite, providers of managed hosting and application management solutions, sold its Lawson/Kronos Managed Application Service business this month in order to "focus on providing Enterprise-class cloud computing for large organisations with complex environments". NaviSite uses Apache on CentOS to run its own website.

    The second most reliable hosting company site in February was DataPipe, responding to all but one of Netcraft's requests.

    DataPipe provides custom managed hosting solutions for businesses with complex Internet facing infrastructures with over 1,000 customers in seven data centres across the United States, Europe and China. DataPipe use Apache on FreeBSD to run their own website.

    Six of the top ten in February were identified as running Linux, two as running FreeBSD and one running Windows Server 2008.

    Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of around forty leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

    From a customer's point of view, the percentage of failed requests is more pertinent than outages on hosting companies' own sites, as this gives a pointer to reliability of routing, and this is why we choose to rank our table by fewest failed requests, rather than shortest periods of outage.

    Further information on the measurement process and current measurements are available.

    Posted by Nick Jones on 1st March, 2010 in Hosting, Performance

  6. Most Reliable Hosting Company Sites in January 2010

    Rank Company site OS Outage
    hh:mm:ss
    Failed
    Req%
    DNS Connect First
    byte
    Total
    1 www.theplanet.com Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.005  0.687 0.074 0.218 0.602
    2 Hosting 4 Less Linux  0:00:00  0.005  0.130 0.090 0.189 0.498
    3 www.navisite.com Linux  0:00:00  0.010  0.773 0.034 0.528 0.631
    4 DataPipe unknown  0:00:00  0.010  0.294 0.036 0.053 0.070
    5 INetU unknown  0:00:00  0.014  0.233 0.036 0.089 0.135
    6 Pair Networks FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.014  0.278 0.045 0.093 0.223
    7 New York Internet FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.019  0.069 0.032 0.070 0.186
    8 Swishmail FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.024  0.558 0.033 0.068 0.173
    9 www.memset.com Linux  0:00:00  0.024  0.658 0.081 0.164 0.164
    10 Verio Linux  0:00:00  0.024  0.186 0.098 0.196 0.196

    See full table

    The first month of 2010 saw The Planet and Hosting 4 Less have the most reliable hosting company sites. Both sites responded to all but one of Netcraft's requests in January.

    The Planet provides dedicated servers, managed hosting and colocation services to more than 20,000 businesses. The company has more than 10 million websites in Netcraft's Hosting Provider Analysis and uses Windows Server 2003 to run its own website.

    Hosting 4 Less offers a 99.9% uptime guarantee, with its own OC48 Sonet Ring connecting their secure data center to the internet. Hosting 4 Less has been running since 1998 and currently uses Apache on Linux to serve its own website.

    Four of the most reliable hosting company sites in January were identified as running Linux, while three were using FreeBSD and one was using Windows Server 2003.

    Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of fifty leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

    From a customer's point of view, the percentage of failed requests is more pertinent than outages on hosting companies' own sites, as this gives a pointer to reliability of routing, and this is why we choose to rank our table by fewest failed requests, rather than shortest periods of outage.

    Further information on the measurement process and current measurements are available.

    Posted by Paul Mutton on 2nd February, 2010 in Hosting, Performance

Page 10 of 48« First...89101112203040...Last »