Although Tim Berners-Lee richly
deserves his knighthood for
creating one of the most important technologies of the 20th century, in one respect the World
Wide Web has failed to deliver. It may have been global from the start - potentially accessible
anywhere in the world - but making it truly international - able to reflect all cultures,
irrespective of their language or writing system - has been an enormous struggle for the non-
The first problem to be addressed was how to create Web pages with characters other
than standard ASCII. The solution seemed simple
enough: the use of extended sets,
which allowed different non-ASCII
characters to be employed on a per-page basis. But the solution brought its own problems,
with many alternative extensions for
a given script.
Therefore, an overarching approach called Unicode was developed that defined a single, universal
coding scheme embracing all scripts. Unicode may not yet include everything, but all the
major families are there, and many of the less
common ones will be added
soon (even Egyptian
hieroglyphs are being worked on).
web site was brought back online by The SCO Group over the weekend after an extended hiatus following the MyDoom-related distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack on the site. The relaunched site experienced a brief outage last night, but otherwise has been available.
A dynamically upgrading graph is available here.
Internet "phishing" scams are incorporating the use of SSL certificates - both real and faked - in their efforts to trick users into divulging sensitive login information for financial accounts.
This trend bears watching, as the presence of an SSL certficate was intially touted by consumer protection groups as a way to differentiate between scams and legitimate sites. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission, for example, offered this advice to consumers concerned about phishing: "Before submitting financial information through a Web site, look for the "lock" icon on the browser's status bar. It signals that your information is secure during transmission."
But security professionals are focused on the limitations of SSL in the wake of a recent scam targeting Earthlink users (mentioned near the bottom of this story) which employed an SSL certificate so the bogus page displayed the lock icon. In this case, the certificate appeared legit because it matched the URL of the fake page mimicking the Earthlink web site, but had no connection to Earthlink. Visitors would only detect the deception if they reviewed the certificate.
A patent on web browser technology held by Eolas Technologies
has been invalidated by the U.S Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), which recognized arguments from the World Wide Web Consortium and others that existing "prior art" should nullify the patent.
If the USPTO decision survives an expected appeal, it will likely void a $521 million jury award against Microsoft for infringing on the Eolas patent with features of its Internet Explorer browser. It also spares Microsoft the need to make modifications to its Windows operating systems and IE browser to allow them to continue to use popular multimedia plugins from Apple, Macromedia, Real Networks and Adobe. Microsoft outlined the planned changes last year but put them on hold in late January as it awaited a ruling from the patent office. The ruling would also avert the need for developers to modify millions of web pages using the HTML tags APPLET, OBJECT and EMBED, which would have been affected by the patent ruling.
The patent in question is held by the University of California and licensed to Eolas Technologies. It covers systems allowing browsers to "access and execute an embedded program object," and is based on work by a Cal team led by Michael Doyle. This "plugin" concept is now widely used to display multimedia within a browser window.
The concept was widely discussed at the time on the www-talk mailing list hosted by Web creator Tim Berners-Lee, as well as by Dave Raggett in the HTML+ specs he authored in 1993-94 for the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).
Nonetheless, the University of California's 1994 patent application for the technology was approved by the USPTO in 1998. Microsoft noted that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has only invalidated 151 patents out of nearly 4 million awarded since 1988. That doesn't reflect patents that have been invalidated by outside court proceedings.
Ten years ago today, spam as we
know it was born. On 5 March 1994, a message was posted to some Usenet
newsgroups by a law firm called Canter and Siegel, advertising their services for the U.S.
Green Card lottery. It sounds mild enough today, but at the time that move and its follow-ups
provoked increasing outrage across the Net. Many were appalled that "netiquette" - the
unspoken rules that hitherto had maintained order in cyberspace - had been breached,
sensing perhaps that things would never be the same again.
They were right, of course. By daring to try what no one had done before, those first spam
messages opened the floodgates to the deluge we battle daily. When it became clear from
Canter and Siegel's continued postings that their spams were being neither effectively blocked
nor ignored, others soon followed in their footsteps.
EV1Servers CEO Robert Marsh is disputing The SCO Group's claim that the dedicated hosting company paid a fee in excess of $1 million to license SCO's intellectual property.
"I would discount ANY reports or quotes of a 7 figure cash payment as has been reported," Marsh wrote in a post on the company's customer forum. "We did agree to a one time payment, however we did not agree to pay a 7 figure cash payment as reported in the media."
Blake Stowell, SCO's director of public relations, told eWeek Monday that EV1Servers "didn't pay full retail price on each server, but the deal was still worth seven figures all together for SCO." Similar quotes attributed to SCO appeared in Network World, Information Week and ComputerWorld, and the figure has been repeated widely in online forums discussing the deal.
What's not clear is whether EV1 and SCO are splitting hairs over definitions - Marsh addressed cash payments, while SCO has talked in terms of "worth" - or there is a larger disconnect between SCO's public statements and the undisclosed financial terms of the deal.
SCO contends that Linux includes copyrighted code from its own operating system, and is asking Linux users to pay $699 per server for a license to use its intellectual property. Under the terms of the agreement announced Monday, SCO will provide EV1Servers.Net with a site license that allows the use of SCO IP in binary form on all Linux servers managed by EV1Servers.Net in each of its hosting facilities.