1. Windows users vulnerable to flaw in Java Web Start

    An unresolved security flaw in Java Web Start could be putting millions of Windows users at risk. The bug – discovered by Tavis Ormandy – allows arbitrary options to be passed to the Java virtual machine via the javaws command line application. This gives an attacker the opportunity to execute malign JAR files on the victim's computer.

    Tavis informed Sun (now owned by Oracle) about this problem, but states they did not consider the vulnerability to be important enough to break their quarterly patch cycle. Given how easily the flaw was discovered, Tavis disagreed and published his advice to temporarily disable the affected control until it gets fixed.

    All versions since Java SE 6 Update 10 for Windows are believed to be vulnerable. Working exploits for this vulnerability are now in the public domain, so it is important to apply one of the workarounds suggested by Tavis:

    • Internet Explorer users can be protected by temporarily setting the killbit on CAFEEFAC-DEC7-0000-0000-ABCDEFFEDCBA.
    • Mozilla Firefox and other NPAPI based browser users can be protected using File System ACLs to prevent access to npdeploytk.dll. These ACLs can also be managed via GPO.

    Full details can be found in Ormandy's post to the Full Disclosure mailing list.

    Netcraft's Web Server Survey shows that Java Web Start is very seldom used by websites, so there is perhaps little to be lost by disabling JNLP support completely. Only 0.002% of the active sites in the April 2010 survey used JNLP technology on their homepages, whereas 0.26% of homepages contained traditional Java Applets.

    Although Java usage is growing amongst mobile devices, and continues to remain strong as a server-side technology, it appears to have lost the battle for interactive client-side desktop browser technology. The combined share of JNLP and Applets pales into insignificance when compared with Adobe Flash, which is now found on more than 15% of all homepages.

    Posted by Paul Mutton on 13th April, 2010 in Security

  2. Most Reliable Hosting Company Sites in March 2010

    Rank Company site OS Outage
    hh:mm:ss
    Failed
    Req%
    DNS Connect First
    byte
    Total
    1 www.memset.com Linux 0:00:00 0.012 0.586 0.129 0.260 0.260
    2 DataPipe FreeBSD 0:00:00 0.016 0.065 0.027 0.056 0.083
    3 iWeb Technologies Linux 0:00:00 0.016 0.134 0.083 0.165 0.165
    4 ReliableServers.com FreeBSD 0:00:00 0.016 0.250 0.083 0.197 0.337
    5 INetU unknown 0:00:00 0.021 0.702 0.073 0.158 0.301
    6 Swishmail FreeBSD 0:00:00 0.021 0.159 0.086 0.173 0.438
    7 www.singlehop.com Linux 0:00:00 0.021 0.258 0.104 0.429 0.962
    8 Hosting 4 Less Linux 0:00:00 0.025 0.116 0.091 0.186 0.474
    9 Kattare Internet Services Linux 0:00:00 0.029 0.153 0.093 0.187 0.443
    10 www.dinahosting.com Linux 0:00:00 0.029 0.121 0.130 0.258 0.258

    See full table

    Memset had the most reliable hosting company site in March, responding to all but three of Netcraft's requests.

    Memset provides dedicated physical and virtual servers, all-inclusive managed hosting and cloud-computing services from their two data centres near Reading, UK. Memset uses Apache on Linux to run their own website.

    The second most reliable hosting company site in March was DataPipe, responding to all but four of Netcraft's requests.

    DataPipe provides custom managed hosting solutions for businesses with complex Internet facing infrastructures with over 1,000 customers in seven data centres across the United States, Europe and China. DataPipe use Apache on FreeBSD to run their own website.

    Six of the top ten in March were identified as running Linux and three as running FreeBSD. The operating system used by one of the top ten could not be identified.

    Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of around forty leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

    From a customer's point of view, the percentage of failed requests is more pertinent than outages on hosting companies' own sites, as this gives a pointer to reliability of routing, and this is why we choose to rank our table by fewest failed requests, rather than shortest periods of outage.

    Further information on the measurement process and current measurements are available.

    Posted by Jennifer Cownie on 1st April, 2010 in Hosting, Performance

  3. March 2010 Web Server Survey

    In the March 2010 survey we received responses from 206,675,938 sites.

    This represents a slight fall in the number of hostnames seen since last month and consequently most of the major web servers experienced small losses in hostnames relative to the February 2010 survey: only lighttpd and Google gained hostnames, with increases of 560k and 275k respectively. The overall gain for lighttpd originates from 785k parked hostnames at SAVVIS in Australia, catapulting the proportion of hostnames using lighttpd in the country from 2.29% in February to 37.80% this month.

    For the third month in a row nginx lost sites, recording 1.3M fewer hostnames in March than in February. This is again due to losses from Wordpress as stale blogs continue to be expired from the survey. nginx also lost in terms of active sites (down 1.2M since last month) while the other major web servers saw minor gains in this metric.

    Total Sites Across All Domains
    August 1995 - March 2010

    Total Sites Across All Domains, August 1995 - March 2010


    Market Share for Top Servers Across All Domains
    August 1995 - March 2010

    Graph of market share for top servers across all domains, August 1995 - March 2010


    DeveloperFebruary 2010PercentMarch 2010PercentChange
    Apache112,903,92654.46%112,747,16654.55%0.09
    Microsoft50,928,22624.57%50,572,54024.47%-0.10
    Google14,315,4646.91%14,592,1337.06%0.16
    nginx13,978,7196.74%12,673,9626.13%-0.61
    lighttpd1,097,6850.53%1,657,5840.80%0.27
    (more...)

    Posted by Netcraft on 17th March, 2010 in Web Server Survey

  4. New browser reports over half of SSL sites may be unsafe

    A new internet browser, Comodo Dragon, reports that more than half of the world's valid SSL certificates are unsafe.

    Comodo Dragon is based on the open source Chromium project, but includes additional security and privacy features. In particular, when a user browses to a site that uses a domain-validated SSL certificate, Comodo Dragon will warn the user that the site may not have undergone trusted third-party validation.

    Comodo Dragon displaying a warning when visiting a domain-validated SSL site

    Users are presented with buttons to "Proceed anyway", or go "Back to safety". The warning message explains why such a site is deemed to be unsafe:

    The security (or SSL) certificate for this website indicates that the organization operating it may not have undergone trusted third-party validation that it is a legitimate business. Although the information passed between you and this website will be encrypted, you have no assurance of who you are actually exchanging information with, and many websites connected to cyber-crimes use this type of security certificate. Prior to exchanging sensitive information including login/password, personal identity information, or financial details such as credit card numbers with any website that generates this warning, you should find some alternative method of validating this business or consider abandoning the transaction.

    Mainstream adoption of this behaviour would have a huge impact on e-commerce — more than half of the SSL certificates in use on the web are domain-validated, and this market continues to show strong growth due to the generally lower costs and ease of issuance when compared with organisation and extended validation certificates.

    However, none of the popular browsers provides an explicit warning when browsing to a domain-validated site. With such widespread use of domain-validated certificates, it would undoubtedly lead to uproar if any of these browsers were to display warnings when users browse to domain-validated sites.

    Although Comodo states that many websites connected to cyber-crimes use domain-validated certificates, Netcraft's phishing site feed shows that only 0.3% of reported phishing sites use HTTPS, including those running on compromised servers with SSL certificates already in place.

    Netcraft found 683,563 valid domain-validated certificates in its March 2010 survey. Go Daddy has issued more than half of these, which it currently sells at $29.99 per year for new purchases.

    Comodo itself is also a sizable player in the domain-validated SSL market, accounting for 7.6% of all domain-validated certificates. Ironically, domain-validated certificates signed by Comodo are also reported as being potentially unsafe, including those sold via hosting companies such as DreamHost.

    DreamHost's CTO, Dallas Kashuba, told Netcraft: "I think the information being presented about the nature of the SSL certificate is useful, but the approach Comodo has taken to present the information is heavy-handed and seems a bit too close to "crying wolf". I worry that users of the browser will see that warning so frequently that they will become desensitized to all warnings."

    Last year, DreamHost launched an amusing tirade against certificate authorities, criticising the "entirely automated" process of issuing domain-validated certificates. To prove a point, DreamHost then began offering domain-validated certificates to existing customers for only $15, stating: "...we're not making anything on them because we feel the whole business is a scam!"

    DreamHost's Kashuba also told Netcraft: "I think Extended Validation SSL certificates are a good way to reduce the impact of phishing and other similar nefarious activities, but is not a necessary expense for most secure websites."

    There is no doubt that upsetting the current level of trust in domain-validated certificates would cause problems: Many FDIC members continue to use domain-validated certificates for their banking sites, including Bank of the Sierra, Bank of Hawaii, TierOne Bank and Great Western Bank.

    For additional information or details on how to order the Netcraft SSL Survey, please contact us at sales@netcraft.com.

    Posted by Paul Mutton on 5th March, 2010 in Security

  5. Most Reliable Hosting Company Sites in February 2010

    Rank Company site OS Outage
    hh:mm:ss
    Failed
    Req%
    DNS Connect First
    byte
    Total
    1 www.navisite.com Linux 0.000 0.779 0.033 0.552 0.656
    2 DataPipe FreeBSD 0:00:00 0.005 0.397 0.035 0.061 0.091
    3 INetU unknown 0:00:00 0.005 0.524 0.050 0.106 0.186
    4 Hosting 4 Less Linux 0:00:00 0.011 0.428 0.105 0.220 0.560
    5 www.singlehop.com Linux 0:00:00 0.016 0.205 0.052 0.342 0.570
    6 www.dinahosting.com Linux 0:00:00 0.016 0.115 0.089 0.182 0.182
    7 New York Internet FreeBSD 0:00:00 0.021 0.054 0.031 0.070 0.195
    8 Virtual Internet Linux 0:00:00 0.021 0.617 0.078 0.210 0.443
    9 www.memset.com Linux 0:00:00 0.021 0.616 0.080 0.160 0.160
    10 Hostbasket Windows Server 2008 0:00:00 0.021 0.377 0.083 0.177 0.177

    See full table

    NaviSite had the most reliable hosting company site in February, responding to all of Netcraft's requests.

    NaviSite, providers of managed hosting and application management solutions, sold its Lawson/Kronos Managed Application Service business this month in order to "focus on providing Enterprise-class cloud computing for large organisations with complex environments". NaviSite uses Apache on CentOS to run its own website.

    The second most reliable hosting company site in February was DataPipe, responding to all but one of Netcraft's requests.

    DataPipe provides custom managed hosting solutions for businesses with complex Internet facing infrastructures with over 1,000 customers in seven data centres across the United States, Europe and China. DataPipe use Apache on FreeBSD to run their own website.

    Six of the top ten in February were identified as running Linux, two as running FreeBSD and one running Windows Server 2008.

    Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of around forty leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

    From a customer's point of view, the percentage of failed requests is more pertinent than outages on hosting companies' own sites, as this gives a pointer to reliability of routing, and this is why we choose to rank our table by fewest failed requests, rather than shortest periods of outage.

    Further information on the measurement process and current measurements are available.

    Posted by Nick Jones on 1st March, 2010 in Hosting, Performance

  6. February 2010 Web Server Survey

    In the February 2010 survey we received responses from 207,316,960 sites.

    The biggest change of the month belongs to Apache with a 1.6M increase in hostnames. It was closely followed by Microsoft which saw a growth of 1.1M.

    After a year long consistent rise nginx is experiencing a loss for a second month in a row as inactive weblogs on WordPress and 163.com are expired out of the survey. This month nginx had a decrease of 1.5M hostnames, which brings its total down to the number of hostnames it had in October.

    China Internet Network Information Center has recently announced a change in the .cn domain name registration regulations. Since December 14th individuals can no longer register .cn domains and a paper application has to be submitted to register one along with photocopies of the company business license and registrant ID. While this has reduced the frequency of .cn domains in spam, it does not seem to have affected the growth of the domain. Netcraft has discovered 49k new hostnames in .cn this month, compared to 37k in December, 59k in November and 39k in October.

    Total Sites Across All Domains
    August 1995 - February 2010

    Total Sites Across All Domains, August 1995 - February 2010


    Market Share for Top Servers Across All Domains
    August 1995 - February 2010

    Graph of market share for top servers across all domains, August 1995 - February 2010


    DeveloperJanuary 2010PercentFebruary 2010PercentChange
    Apache111,307,94153.84%112,903,92654.46%0.62
    Microsoft49,792,84424.08%50,928,22624.57%0.48
    Google14,550,0117.04%14,315,4646.91%-0.13
    nginx15,568,2247.53%13,978,7196.74%-0.79
    lighttpd955,1460.46%1,097,6850.53%0.07
    (more...)

    Posted by Netcraft on 22nd February, 2010 in Web Server Survey