Netcraft recently confirmed that a Bangladesh Army site was hosting an Outlook Web Access (OWA) web shell. Additionally, an OWA web shell was found on the Department of Arts and Culture site for the South-African Kwazulu-Natal province and an Iraqi government site was found to be hosting a PHP shell. Web shells are a common tool used by attackers to maintain control of a compromised web server, providing a web interface from which arbitrary commands can be executed on the server hosting the shell. OWA provides remote access to Microsoft Exchange mailboxes; since the disclosure of the ProxyLogon vulnerabilities in March, Microsoft Exchange has become a popular target for cyberattacks.
Netcraft has to date identified nearly 10,000 websites used in the distribution of the FluBot family of Android malware. As detailed in our previous articles on FluBot, these sites are unwittingly hosting a PHP script that acts as a proxy to a further backend server, allowing otherwise legitimate sites to deliver Android malware to victims. When visited by the intended victim, a “lure” is displayed that implores them to download and install the FluBot malware.
The most common lure themes are parcel delivery and voicemail messages, where the user is told to install the malicious app to track a parcel or listen to a voicemail message. One particularly interesting lure took advantage of FluBot’s infamy, by offering a fake “Android security update” that claimed to protect against the malware family. Users installing this “security update” would instead be infected with FluBot.
Most sites distributing FluBot malware also host legitimate content, suggesting they were compromised by the operators of this malware distribution network, without the knowledge of the site operator. While the use of unrelated domains makes the lures less convincing, as compared to domains specifically registered for fraud, it allows the malware distribution network to operate at a much larger scale.
These affected sites all have one factor in common: they run self-hosted WordPress instances. Netcraft believes the operators of this malware distribution network are actively exploiting well-known vulnerabilities in WordPress plugins and themes to upload malicious content onto insecure sites, joining a growing list of threat actors doing the same.
The Government of Eswatini’s website,
www.gov.sz, is running a
use website visitors' CPU power to mine cryptocurrency, most often without their knowledge or permission.
28th September and
The US and others may have withdrawn from Afghanistan, but many Afghan Government websites and email addresses under the .gov.af top-level domain are still very much dependent on services hosted outside of the country – mostly in the US.
By taking control of Afghanistan, the Taliban has inherited these government domains and now shares web hosting and mail servers with several other governments around the world, including the UK Government. In many cases, emails sent to .gov.af domains will be routed through US-hosted servers, presenting intelligence opportunities if the new Taliban government were to continue using them.
FluBot has built up a community of compromised Android phones in the UK since April and in the past 24 hours has commenced monetising them by sending overlays for British Banks.
FluBot first appeared in 2020, targeting mainly Spanish banks, but recently it has spread its reach, with Australian, German and Polish banks all affected within the last few weeks. UK banks are now firmly in its sights, with HSBC and Santander the first to be affected, and Lloyds and Halifax following shortly after.
The coronavirus pandemic resulted in the closure of many bricks and mortar retail stores, forcing UK consumers to adopt online shopping more than ever before. This trend has largely continued in spite of many stores since reopening, as millions of consumers have become accustomed to the practical benefits of online shopping.
Along with this increased volume of online shopping came a new trend of phishing attacks where cybercriminals impersonate parcel delivery companies in an attempt to steal financial details from their victims. Royal Mail and Hermes were popular targets for these types of attack, but most new attacks now impersonate the Post Office.
These attacks are typically disseminated via text message, informing the victim that they have missed a delivery. Sometimes the messages say up front that the recipient must rebook the delivery by paying a small surcharge. The relatively small surcharge is often sufficient to trick victims into believing the phishing site is legitimate, or at least that any risk is minimal, allowing the phisher to obtain the victim’s details and potentially steal a much larger amount.
As most of the attacks are orchestrated via text message, the phishing sites are usually hosted with purpose-bought domain names that include the targeted company’s name in an attempt to be convincing. Some examples include:
Some messages instead use generic URL shorteners to take victims to the phishing sites, but this would not necessarily be viewed as suspicious by all recipients, as the use of URL shorteners is commonplace even in legitimate text messages.
Most of the phishing kits used in these attacks also attempt to evade detection by blocking unwanted clients such as bots and anti-phishing organisations, but Netcraft successfully circumvents these checks.
After impersonating the delivery company, some of these phishing attacks proceed to also impersonate one of several UK banks. This gives the criminal an opportunity to steal additional credentials that are specific to each bank, such as online banking security codes and other tokens that would likely be used to gain unauthorised access to the victim’s bank account.
Some attacks - particularly those that do not use the phishing site to directly impersonate the victim’s bank - are followed up by a phone call from the cybercriminal, who will use the information stolen by the phishing site to convince the victim that it is a genuine call from their bank regarding the payment they just made. This provides a more interactive opportunity for the criminal to obtain the information required to gain access to the victim’s bank account, including time-sensitive OTP codes.
Posted by Paul Mutton in Security
Your link here? Advertising on the Netcraft Blog